PSYCHIATRY IS TOAST CopyRight

 AIMEE HOLEM Aug 5, 2021  Amy Holem Digital Forensic Audio Specialist has some great information https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV3p3swqE8M     ----------------------------------------------------------------------- AIMEE  HOLEM 2019   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6VATjBZKW4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AIMEE 2019 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Os8MldFrRoXw/ DONATE TO AIMEE https://gofund.me/13eb95e4 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Amy Holem is a Computer Forensic Analyst. from the site: Almost finished her courses, she has already won several cases with her reports that evidence many many perps in isolated audio files. At last the nightmare is both proven and indictable. Sean Frankforth is our returning guest who works hard to reverse his targeting by getting evidence and fighting against the oft diagnoses of crazy. Amy and Sean work together to build Sean's case which is now moving forward. Docto

 https://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/NatureandArtifice/week9c.html

10 MINUTE  MARK IF YOU ARE IN A HURRY   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EMvU6SeO_E

  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10509580902986369?journalCode=gerr20 excerpt  quote: "Long before Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was published in 1818, an author penned a story that resembles it on more than one account: François‐Félix Nogaret, Le Miroir des évènemens contemporains, ou la belle au plus bidder(The Looking Glass of Actuality, or Beauty to the Highest Bidder, 1790). Nogaret's story about an inventor named Frankenstein who builds an artificial man is an astounding precursor, especially since the Revolution and its attempt to make a “new man” have long focused interpretations of Shelley's work. Both texts ask whether technological innovation will help or hinder human progress, and provide answers reflecting their differing historical and ideological contexts. What seemed possible in 1790 was later viewed with skepticism, including by Nogaret himself in subsequent editions of Le Miroir (1795, 1800). The tension between enthusiasm and disdain for t

 YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY?   These “robots” are  physically identical to humans, with the strength and capabilities to work . However, they initially lack feelings and sentiments and thus do not need necessities like salaries as they lack the desire or need to spend money. https://3seaseurope.com/afraid-of-robots-taking-over-the-world-blame-czechs-who-invented-them/ ARCHIVED https://archive.is/PTjBh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Capek https://www.jstor.org/stable/4213057 YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY? --------------------  By the early years of the Great Depression, the robot-as-machine was a commonplace in popular and labor media. Whether writers deployed it as a negative symbol of unemployment and cheapened culture, or as a symbol of technological innovation and progress, the robot of the 1930s was mechanical rather than organic. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0jm096mm/qt0jm096mm_noSplash_5416fdd39c92681edc113e16c1a7d9db.pdf ------------------